|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
983
   |
Posted - 2014.11.27 23:13:33 -
[1] - Quote
Viribus wrote:anyway while we're living in a fantasy world where CCP actually takes an interest in the balance of their game, i've compiled an abridged list of things that are a complete joke in PVP for the highly-competent balance wizards of Crowd Control Productions to consider:
- Medium autocannons
- Hurricanes
- Drakes
- Harbingers
- Prophecies
- Brutixes
- Heavy missiles
- Cruise missiles
- Torpedoes
- Pretty much every tech 1 battleship, but especially the Raven and Whyphoon (named because why would you fly one??)
- Target spectrum breakers (i forgot these existed for the better part of a year)
- Pilgrims
- Every sansha ship
- Cynabals
- Dragoons
- Coraxes
- Exequror NIs
- Nighthawks
while we're at it, whatever genius thought it was a good idea to give bubble immunity to interceptors needs his brain examined, maybe even replaced
corax's, highthawks,dragoons and prophecies whats up with them? .. the rest i get
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
983
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 23:42:16 -
[2] - Quote
cruisers doing more dps than combat bc's is a little broke
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
987
|
Posted - 2014.11.27 23:57:48 -
[3] - Quote
perhaps if they undone the big buff they made too light missiles then the tracking bonus on the corax might be more meaningful
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
995
|
Posted - 2014.11.28 20:15:29 -
[4] - Quote
Catherine Laartii wrote:Arthur Aihaken wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:This would extend to the Vexor as well? So would BC's be able to use heavies and sentries? I think all ships aside from battlecruisers and battleships should be restricted to light and medium drones. No sentries and definitely no Geckos. I second the opinion that drone boats, specifically of the cruiser class, should be relegated to using medium and small drones. It gives them enough utility to be able to easily engage ships smaller than them, but they should NOT be able to field battleship damage to ships larger than them. To counter this loss though, I would propse that the prophecy and myrmidon respectively get their drone mbit and m3 increased by 25 and 50 respectively, making them specifically usable with heavies and sentries. This gives a clear role for heavy damage without being broken all to hell like the ishtar is with having excellent mobility to top it off. I would be fine with having the ishtar and ishkur respectively get a repair bonus; i think an armor rep bonus would be a nice offset to losing all that dps on the ishtar. Rolling the ishkur's drone bay bonus into the hull would be effortless.
i think the prophecy should return too being the bigger brother of the maller ... develop the harbinger into a faster attack bc, push ABC's to being T2 bc's too make way for using 4 of the combat bc's as attack bc's
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1015
|
Posted - 2014.12.02 23:54:39 -
[5] - Quote
scorchlikeshiswhiskey wrote:Nerfing sentries to fix one ship makes about as much sense as nerfing HML's to fix Drakes. Just my thought on that last part...
drakes power has always been in its tank , which barely got touched, HML's only needed a slight nerf too its tracking of small ships really and maybe a little range.
it still outperforms the ferox bar, the rail ferox setup, which is a shame .. making the drake more caracal like would have made more sense, less tank, remove the resist bonus, for more mobility and better projection..
changing the ABC's into T2 would allow for the brutix, drake, harbinger and hurricane too become proper ABC's
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1017
|
Posted - 2014.12.03 10:44:55 -
[6] - Quote
J A Aloysiusz wrote:Lastly, before I walk away from the computer (I swear, I'll do it!), I'll mention that I don't see much complaining about the heavy drone ishtar, despite its epic raw DPS.
If ishtar loses a sentry, should it lose a heavy drone as well?
i think the better ooption is just to reduce the damage bonuses for heavies/sentries to 7.5% removing a drone enitrely might be too heavy a nerf.
reducing dronebay to 250 would force more sacrificies and stop the easy use of replacing sentry drones that die.
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1048
|
Posted - 2014.12.11 22:44:11 -
[7] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Grytok wrote:If we want to fix the Ishtar in a fashionable manner I'd suggest reducing the bandwitch to 50mb and change it's boni to medium-drones and armor-tank. Remove one med and give it an additional low slot.
Gila says Hi! If you do this to it either the Ishtar or the Gila become never used.
i'd bet on the ishtar, when you consider how OP the gila is right now.
the nerf needs too be more reducing its effectiveness with sentries and to a lesser extent heavies.
nerf its dronebay too 250, this limits options and replacement waves and makes sense on a cruiser hull too have less bay than a battleship. VNI for example.
and reduce its drone damage bonuses to 7.5% too sentries and heavies.
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists.
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please.
|
|
|
| |
|